<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women in Media</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.onesmallseed.com/2011/12/issue-24-taster-women-in-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.onesmallseed.com/2011/12/issue-24-taster-women-in-the-media/</link>
	<description>South Africa&#039;s Pop Culture Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2015 02:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonneke Toen</title>
		<link>https://www.onesmallseed.com/2011/12/issue-24-taster-women-in-the-media/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lonneke Toen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onesmallseed.com/?p=9805#comment-2853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes indeed! I think this is nice article! sometimes it&#039;s good to just think about it..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed! I think this is nice article! sometimes it&#8217;s good to just think about it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shorts</title>
		<link>https://www.onesmallseed.com/2011/12/issue-24-taster-women-in-the-media/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shorts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onesmallseed.com/?p=9805#comment-2851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like it was written by a first year media student. Points made need more context for these arguments to be strong and interesting. The feminist argument also sounds a little regurgitated (&quot;reinforce the fetishized sexual objectification of women blah blah blah&quot;)... so what&#039;s new?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like it was written by a first year media student. Points made need more context for these arguments to be strong and interesting. The feminist argument also sounds a little regurgitated (&#8220;reinforce the fetishized sexual objectification of women blah blah blah&#8221;)&#8230; so what&#8217;s new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NO</title>
		<link>https://www.onesmallseed.com/2011/12/issue-24-taster-women-in-the-media/#comment-2847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onesmallseed.com/?p=9805#comment-2847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it would be more interesting if feminists and your magazine decided to look at how men are portrayed in the media and how they are viewed in women&#039;s eyes, instead of beating the old  trite sexist feminist war horse. Of course you wouldn&#039;t be able to show loads of sexy women and the magazine would be a accused of being sexist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be more interesting if feminists and your magazine decided to look at how men are portrayed in the media and how they are viewed in women&#8217;s eyes, instead of beating the old  trite sexist feminist war horse. Of course you wouldn&#8217;t be able to show loads of sexy women and the magazine would be a accused of being sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
